🏠 首页 🔝

第九篇 对今日基督徒中间的情形该有的态度

启示的事奉

📖 研读 📊 汇集 🇬🇧 English 📋 对照
  本篇信息我们要交通到关乎召会和事奉上的难处。有些时候,弟兄们在事奉上常遇到一个问题,就是在面对其他基督徒团体时,不知该持何种态度。这是一个很现实的问题,各处圣徒们也常遇到这个问题。因此我们要在神面前花一点工夫来探究。
 
  首先,我们对于今日基督徒中间的情形,应该要有清楚的认识。召会已经经过两千年,范围几乎遍布全球各大洲,历经地上各民族。一样东西或事物,经过长远的时间,广大的地面,和各种不同的民族,绝对难以保持其原貌,这是可想而知的。所以,我们在两千年后的今天所见的召会,已经是走样的召会。
 
  召会经过广大的地面,历经各样不同的人种,而且时间跨越那样长久,牵涉的因素那样繁多、复杂,走样是难免的。凡有头脑的,都不会相信召会至今仍保持第一世纪的原样。召会已经走样,已经被人改得太多,所以我们对于今日召会的各面情形都要打问号,都要问:“这是召会当初的样子么?这是召会当初有的情形么?”我们不能一概的接受,马虎的承认,乃要认真的一一查问。若是对的,不会因为我们的查问,变作不对的;若是出于神的,不会因为我们的质疑,变作有问题的。
  我们今天事奉主,应该绝对照着召会当初的样子。凡是与召会当初的样子不合的,凡是召会当初所没有的,不管人看为多美好、多重要,我们都应该脱离,应该去掉。凡是走样、经过人改过的,我们统统都应该脱离,应该丢弃。我们要回到召会当初的样子。
 
  那么,召会在那些事上走样了呢?举例而言,在今天的基督教里有许多不同的会;无论在哪里有基督教,那里就有这个会、那个会。看见这么多不同的会,我们该问:“这是召会当初的原样么?”我们若认真查问,就会晓得这些都不是召会当初原有的。召会在当初是不分会、不分派的。虽然召会刚在地上出现时,是分在各地方,但在每一个地方的召会都是不分会、不分派的。在以弗所,只有在以弗所的召会,并没有在以弗所的这个会、那个会。在哥林多,只有在哥林多的召会,并没有在哥林多的这个会、那个会。今天各地有许多不同的基督教堂会,都是后来的人创出来的,并不是召会原有的。召会当初虽然有长老,却没有长老会;虽然实行受浸,却没有浸信会;虽然讲圣洁,却没有圣洁会;虽然有因信称义,却没有信义会;虽然有灵恩,却没有灵恩会。这些会和其他的许多会,都是今天基督教走样的情形,是我们应该脱离的。
  今天在基督教里有牧师,在天主教里有神甫。对于这些,我们也该问:“这是召会当初所有的么?”我们若仔细查问,就知道这是召会当初所没有的,乃是后来的人发明的。当初召会虽然有牧人和教师等有恩赐的人(弗四11),却没有坐堂牧师,没有牧师制度,没有神甫制度,没有圣品阶级。召会当初是所有的信徒都作祭司(彼前二5),都事奉神,在信徒与神之间并没有一班居间的人,没有一班圣品的人专司事奉神的事。今天的牧师制度、神甫制度、圣品阶级,都不是召会当初事奉神的原样,乃是经过人手改动而有的,所以是走样的,也是我们应该否认、拒绝的。
  今天基督教里有领薪水的职业传道,这也是走样的情形。召会当初有主所差遣的工人,却没有人所聘雇的职业传道;有凭信心事奉主而生活的,却没有靠薪水作传道当职业的。这种职业传道及薪水制度,乃是召会走样的情形,是基督教堕落所产生的结果。
  今日不论是天主教、或更正教的礼拜堂,也是召会走样的例证。当初只有“聚会的地方”(徒四31二十8),并没有礼拜堂。我们聚会的地方,不应该是一般人所想的“圣所”。如果我们聚会的地方是圣所、礼拜堂,那么凡是圣徒所在的地方,没有一处不是圣所或礼拜堂。在任何地方我们都能敬拜。敬拜不在乎地方,乃在乎灵。在约翰四章,主说,“时候将到,那时你们敬拜父,不在这山上〔撒玛利亚〕,也不在耶路撒冷。…神是灵;敬拜祂的,必须在灵…里敬拜。”(约四2124)我们敬拜神,乃是在灵里,所以无论在哪里我们都能敬拜,无论什么地方都能作我们敬拜的地方。所谓的礼拜堂不是当初的召会所有的,乃是堕落的基督教产生的。堕落越深,走样越远,就越变成礼拜堂的样子。今天在中外许多地方,最高、最好的建筑物就是礼拜堂。这不是召会原初的样子,乃是后来的人改变成的。
  关于基督教里的施浸或施洗,大多也是走样的。圣经明明给我们看见,召会当初给人施浸,乃是把人浸到水里(太三16可一58徒八38)。但是今天的基督教,大多是用水在人头上洒一洒。浸信会虽然在施浸的事上是把人浸在水里,但他们只有牧师能给人施浸。这也是走样的情形。新约圣经给我们看见,当初乃是什么人传福音带人得救,就由什么人给人施浸(徒八26~38九10~18)。当然,这样作乃是郑重地按正规而作,不是轻易为之,随便作的。但绝不是信徒传福音,由牧师施浸;平信徒传福音,由圣品人施浸。今日牧师给人施浸或施洗的制度并不是召会原有的,乃是经过人意而走样的作法。
  所谓的“圣餐”也是走样的。不仅是天主教里的弥撒,离圣经所说召会原初擘饼的情形相差甚远;就连更正教里的圣餐,也与召会原初擘饼的原样差距甚大。连“圣餐”的称呼都是走样的。圣经是说“晚餐”(林前十一20),从来没有称“圣餐”。现今有些地方吃圣餐,是用面包切成许多块,不像召会当初众圣徒只擘一个饼,只喝一个杯,见证基督的身体只有个(十16~17)。吃圣餐的饼是切开的,杯是分开的,这些都是走样的情形。
  不只如此,他们说,众信徒只能领圣餐,只有牧师是专门分圣餐的。这形成了两种不同的地位,种是分给的,种是领受的。然而圣经给我们看见,在擘饼的时候,所有圣徒来到主面前都是同等的地位,都是领受的,没有一个是分给的(太二六26~28林前十16~17)。众人都是直接从主手中领受,没有一个人代表主来分授。若有人代表,他就是越分的,是篡越主的。今日即使保罗来到我们中间,他也不过是位弟兄,和我们站在同等地位领受主的晚餐,不能代表主来分晚餐。召会当初擘饼时,所有信徒都是领受的,没有一个人是代表主来分授的。
  今日有的基督教团体是由信徒选举长老,这也是走样的情形。圣经给我们看见,当初召会的长老不是众信徒选举的,乃是:()有弟兄的生命和情形在众信徒中显为长而老的,就应该作长老(徒十五2提前五17);()由使徒或使徒所指派的人,随圣灵的引导指定这样显为长而老的人作长老(提多一5)。今日由众教友投票选举长老,是召会当初所没有的。
  今日基督教里庆祝各种节期,像耶诞节、受难节、复活节等,也都是走样的产物。召会当初除了吃主的晚餐记念主之外,没有任何记念和节期。虽然圣经记载了主的降生、受死和复活,但圣经绝没有吩咐我们要过耶诞节、受难节和复活节。召会历史告诉我们,召会起初并没有这些节期,乃是后来的人加上的,甚至还掺杂了异教的作法,所以都是走样的。
  此外,还有许多走样的名目或事物,我们无法一一列举。盼望圣徒们都记住,这些乃是召会当初所没有的,都是经过后来的人更改或加添,所以都是走样的。凡圣经没有的,凡不合乎圣经的,我们都该否认并弃绝。
 
  我们注意这些事,不是刻意要与别人有不同的意见,不同的看法,乃是觉得应该强调让圣灵有主权。我们所争、所看重的,不是样式或仪文,乃是圣灵的主权。所有今日基督教里走样的情形,都抹煞了圣灵的主权。
  比方,我们不赞成信徒选举长老,不仅是因为那和召会当初的原样不合,更是因为那抹煞了圣灵的主权。选举长老,乃是让人和人的意见在召会里有地位,不是让圣灵在召会里有主权。圣经给我们看见,召会中的长老就是监督,乃是“圣灵立”的(徒二十1728)。圣灵在召会里,先将神儿女中那些长而老的弟兄显出来,再引导使徒立他们为长老。在召会里,有的弟兄让圣灵带领走在前头,他们比众圣徒更属灵、更认识主,圣灵就在众圣徒中间,显出他们是长而老的人。他们爱主最多,出代价最多,关心神的儿女最多,在召会里劳苦最多,圣灵就在他们身上有主权,显出他们是长老。然后,圣灵借着那让祂有主权的使徒,将祂所已经显出长而老的弟兄,立为长老。所以长老的显出与设立,都是圣灵的主权。
  若是由信徒选举长老,情形就完全不同了。投票选举长老,是让人和人的意见有主权,但却抹煞了圣灵的主权。有什么团体投票选举长老是跟随圣灵的引导,根据圣灵在人身上的地位?几乎都是以人的眼光,根据人属世的地位、钱财、势力而选出来的。这种方式不让圣灵显明人,让圣灵作主掌权,反而是人意登了宝座。投票选举是一个由人意作主的办法;圣经里没有这个办法,我们也不采用这办法。
  再比方,我们所以不赞成牧师分圣餐,不仅是因为与圣经不合,与召会当初的方式不合,更是因为那是人的作法,篡夺了圣灵的主权,没有让圣灵作主运行。众弟兄姊妹来到主的桌子前擘饼时都是同等的,不该有某个人作主席,乃该让圣灵来带领,让圣灵在会中作主而运行;无论蒙恩久的或蒙恩浅的,无论弟兄或姊妹,都让圣灵作主,让圣灵运行,随圣灵引导而祷告,因圣灵的感动而赞美。圣灵能运行,圣灵在聚会中有完全的自由,所以什么弟兄都可以受圣灵引导选诗,让圣灵感动他为饼杯祝谢。然而,若由牧师或某一个人作主席分圣餐,就必然会抹煞圣灵在众信徒中间的主权,销灭圣灵的运行。所以,圣经没有这种实行,我们也不要这个实行。
  神甫制度、牧师制度、圣品阶级,无一不是人的作法,无一不篡夺圣灵的主权。圣灵该在所有蒙恩的人身上有主权,使他们都得以事奉神。但神甫制度、牧师制度、圣品阶级,抹煞了圣灵在众信徒身上的主权,使他们在事奉神的事上作了失职的人。
  宗派的产生,公会的存在,都是人的意见胜过主的话语,人的办法胜过主的定规,人的主权胜过主的主权,胜过圣灵的主权。人如果肯让主作主,让圣灵掌权,让主的话语胜过人的意见,让主的定规胜过人的办法,宗派就绝无产生的机会,公会也难有存在的余地。所以,宗派的问题不仅要问合不合乎圣经,更要问是人的意见算数还是主的话语算数,是人作主还是主作主?
  所谓耶诞节、受难节、复活节,以及今日天主教或更正教里许多作法和礼仪,无一不是人的意见胜过了主的话语,人的办法胜过了主的定规,人作主胜过了主作主。人如果肯让主作主胜过人作主,肯让主的话语抹煞人的意见,肯让主的定规吞灭人的办法,今日的基督教就要变作何等单纯而刚强,圣别而丰富。今日的基督教所以如此掺杂而软弱,妥协而贫穷,就是因为人的意见、人的办法、人的主权,在其中有了地位。所以,我们要脱去一切掺杂、妥协的事物,才能单纯、圣别的事奉主。凡是召会当初所没有的,凡是与圣经的教训、原则和榜样不合的,必是人意的掺杂,属世的调和;我们都该脱离,都该弃绝。
  举这些具体的例子,圣徒们就可以知道,为什么我们在许多事上似乎和别人不同,甚至有争执。或许有的人要说,不必这样分别,不必这样争执;但我们无法不如此,因为我们看这些事非常严重。我们在神面前蒙了怜悯,知道这一个分别太大!到底是人在召会中有主权,还是主在召会中有主权?不是争外面的对错,乃是争到底是谁在召会中有主权、有地位。
  所有问题都在于,是人和人的意见在召会里有地位,还是圣灵在召会里有主权。我们若只争外面对不对,只注重外表、仪式,就是何等的可怜。然而我们注重的不仅仅是外表,更是主的主权;不是仅仅争圣餐对不对,乃是争在擘饼时,主到底有没有完全的主权;不是单单争选举长老对不对,更是争在长老产生的事上,到底圣灵有没有完全的主权。所有问题都在这一点。你我若在主面前清楚这件事,关心圣灵在召会中的主权,就无法再活在基督教走样的情形里。你一遇到那种情形,里面会难过。不仅大事上,即使是小事上,你一看见人不让圣灵作主,里面就会觉得痛心。
  因这缘故,我们愿意把所有今日基督教里和召会当初原样不合的情形,不管它是什么来源,是多好、多有价值,统统都摆在边。这并不是因为别人那样作,我们偏偏要这样作。如果我们居心如此,那就完全错了。我们没有一点意思要故意和别人不同,我们不过是要让圣灵在召会中,恢复祂的主权,恢复祂的地位。我们不是要和别人闹意见,乃是要顾到圣灵的主权和主的地位。
  我们把今日基督教里走样的情形摆在边,单纯的是因为那些情形抹煞了主的地位,抹煞了圣灵的主权。我们愿意在召会中,让主恢复祂的地位,让圣灵恢复祂的主权,而回到召会当初的原样。
 
  我们清楚今日基督徒中间的情形之后,就知道在人面前该用怎样的态度,来摸召会的事,才是对的。首先,我们的事奉主要是注重积极的事,并不是注重这些消极的事。虽然我们不赞成今日基督教里走样的事,但反对这些事不是我们事奉所注重的。我们被主兴起来,不是要批评别人的错,攻击别人的错;那不是我们的职事。我们被主兴起来,目的乃是要把对的给人。我们不是受差遣作消极的工作,乃是受差遣作积极的工作。我们说到这些消极的情形,是要用来作背景,衬托出积极的情形。我们举例,并没有意思要攻击人、反对人。我们不是要和人争论,而是要坚持我们所蒙的光照。我们不愿和人起争论,因为争论是没有用处的。
  我们不该在消极的事上和人争辩,乃该供应并给人看见积极的事。人看见积极方面对的光景,就会认识消极方面错的情形。这样的人如果仍执意留在错的情形里,那么他就必须向主负责。召会今天已经紊乱了,我们无法管太多的事,只能把真理陈明出来,盼望所有错乱的情形都拨乱反正,理得正确。因此,我们的职事不是要批评任何人,攻击任何人,或反对任何人。
  我们的事奉该站在对的地位上,用对的态度作对的事。在一切事奉主的事上,我们一面该在外面有合乎圣经的表样,另一面更该在里面有属灵的实际。我们该照着圣经的真理,在圣灵的实际里事奉主。凡圣经所没有的,凡召会原初没有的,我们都不该要,不该作。但别人如果要那些事,作那些事,我们不批评也不反对,因为批评、反对不是我们的职事。
  其次,我们也该有个态度,不怕人批评我们或反对我们,只顾到神所给我们的负担。只要我们所作的是出乎主,就不该管人怎样对待我们。人赞成,我们是这样作;人反对,我们也是这样作。我们这样作或者不这样作,不该受人的影响,只该受神的支配。我们的心只该向着神,我们的眼也只该看着神;我们只该讨神的喜悦,不该管人的好恶。
  我们不该批评人,也不该怕人批评。我们只该凭着清洁的良心,照着圣经的亮光,跟随圣灵的引导,作神所要我们作的。至于别人如何作,或如何看待我们,都不是我们的事。这就是我们在人面前该有的态度。
 
  我们在人面前该有对的态度,在神面前也该有对的态度。我们清楚今日基督徒中间的情形,也清楚神将我们兴起来的目的,并且在人面前也有不偏不倚的正确态度;这时,我们就可以,也应该,向神表示我们的态度。
  我们在人面前的态度要对,在神面前的态度也要对。我们看见今日基督徒中间的种种情形,不能立刻就厌恶、定罪。我们要求神扩大我们的度量,来容纳神所容纳的。我们该在神面前表示:“我们在这里事奉你,不是出于我们,乃是出于你。是你将我们兴起来,叫我们事奉你。若是我们在这里有那些事奉使你儿子的福音和见证得益处的,就求你祝福。如果有那些事奉是叫你儿子的福音受亏损,叫你儿子的见证受搅扰的,就求你伸手拦阻,并收回你的祝福。这不是为着我们,乃是为着你。”这样的表示是厉害的,不只是向神表示我们的态度,也是和神办交涉。如果我们的立场、存心以及态度是对的,我们向神的表示非常容易蒙神眷顾。
  我们需要在神面前表示我们的态度,向神发出这样厉害的祷告。这样的祷告不是平常的祷告,不是苦求或哀告,乃是交涉。交涉需要正确的地位。我们的地位必须是为着神的,才能有这样与神办交涉的祷告。我们必须是神所兴起、所差遣的,不照自己的意愿作事。若非如此,我们就不能这样祷告。我们若不能这样祷告,我们的事奉就有问题。
  我们必须能够说,不是我们自己要这样作,也不是我们和基督教闹意见,要自立一个团体来聚会,乃是神的灵在祂的恩典中眷顾了我们,叫我们里面有负担、有感觉,非这样起来事奉祂不可。这不是因着我们自己的爱好,为着自己的娱乐,乃是因着神的启示,为着神的托付。我们能坦然对神说,“神啊,你知道这些事不是我愿意作的,这条路也不是我要走的,这一切与我没有利益,对我也没有享受。乃是你抓住我作这些事,走这条路,并这样事奉你。所以这是你的事,不是我的事;是你负责,不是我负责。”若是这样,我们就有正确的地位和立场。
  有了这样的地位,我们也该向神祷告和表示说,“你儿女所作的工作,凡是与你的召会和见证有益的,我们都赞成,都求你祝福。否则,就求你拦阻那个工作,收回你的祝福。”我们若在对的立场上这样祷告和表示,神的手定规要出来干涉,很多难处就要得着解决。辩论没有用,我们必须有对的立场,然后根据这立场向神祷告,向神表示我们的态度。神就要出来干涉,表白谁是在地上和祂表同情,作祂的出口。
  我们该在神面前表示我们的态度,而不应该含糊。神喜悦在地上有人站在祂这一边,与祂表同情。我们该对祂说,我们要祂所要的,拒绝祂所不要的。我们该向祂表示我们的态度。
  原刊于一九五一年八月“话语职事”第二期
  本篇信息我们要交通到关乎召会和事奉上的难处。有些时候,弟兄们在事奉上常遇到一个问题,就是在面对其他基督徒团体时,不知该持何种态度。这是一个很现实的问题,各处圣徒们也常遇到这个问题。因此我们要在神面前花一点工夫来探究。
 
  首先,我们对于今日基督徒中间的情形,应该要有清楚的认识。召会已经经过两千年,范围几乎遍布全球各大洲,历经地上各民族。一样东西或事物,经过长远的时间,广大的地面,和各种不同的民族,绝对难以保持其原貌,这是可想而知的。所以,我们在两千年后的今天所见的召会,已经是走样的召会。
 
  召会经过广大的地面,历经各样不同的人种,而且时间跨越那样长久,牵涉的因素那样繁多、复杂,走样是难免的。凡有头脑的,都不会相信召会至今仍保持第一世纪的原样。召会已经走样,已经被人改得太多,所以我们对于今日召会的各面情形都要打问号,都要问:“这是召会当初的样子么?这是召会当初有的情形么?”我们不能一概的接受,马虎的承认,乃要认真的一一查问。若是对的,不会因为我们的查问,变作不对的;若是出于神的,不会因为我们的质疑,变作有问题的。  我们今天事奉主,应该绝对照着召会当初的样子。凡是与召会当初的样子不合的,凡是召会当初所没有的,不管人看为多美好、多重要,我们都应该脱离,应该去掉。凡是走样、经过人改过的,我们统统都应该脱离,应该丢弃。我们要回到召会当初的样子。
 
  那么,召会在那些事上走样了呢?举例而言,在今天的基督教里有许多不同的会;无论在哪里有基督教,那里就有这个会、那个会。看见这么多不同的会,我们该问:“这是召会当初的原样么?”我们若认真查问,就会晓得这些都不是召会当初原有的。召会在当初是不分会、不分派的。虽然召会刚在地上出现时,是分在各地方,但在每一个地方的召会都是不分会、不分派的。在以弗所,只有在以弗所的召会,并没有在以弗所的这个会、那个会。在哥林多,只有在哥林多的召会,并没有在哥林多的这个会、那个会。今天各地有许多不同的基督教堂会,都是后来的人创出来的,并不是召会原有的。召会当初虽然有长老,却没有长老会;虽然实行受浸,却没有浸信会;虽然讲圣洁,却没有圣洁会;虽然有因信称义,却没有信义会;虽然有灵恩,却没有灵恩会。这些会和其他的许多会,都是今天基督教走样的情形,是我们应该脱离的。  今天在基督教里有牧师,在天主教里有神甫。对于这些,我们也该问:“这是召会当初所有的么?”我们若仔细查问,就知道这是召会当初所没有的,乃是后来的人发明的。当初召会虽然有牧人和教师等有恩赐的人(弗四11),却没有坐堂牧师,没有牧师制度,没有神甫制度,没有圣品阶级。召会当初是所有的信徒都作祭司(彼前二5),都事奉神,在信徒与神之间并没有一班居间的人,没有一班圣品的人专司事奉神的事。今天的牧师制度、神甫制度、圣品阶级,都不是召会当初事奉神的原样,乃是经过人手改动而有的,所以是走样的,也是我们应该否认、拒绝的。
--------本段经节汇集--------
祂所赐的,有些是使徒,有些是申言者,有些是传福音者,有些是牧人和教师,
也就像活石,被建造成为属灵的殿,成为圣别的祭司体系,借着耶稣基督献上神所悦纳的属灵祭物。
------------------------
  今天基督教里有领薪水的职业传道,这也是走样的情形。召会当初有主所差遣的工人,却没有人所聘雇的职业传道;有凭信心事奉主而生活的,却没有靠薪水作传道当职业的。这种职业传道及薪水制度,乃是召会走样的情形,是基督教堕落所产生的结果。  今日不论是天主教、或更正教的礼拜堂,也是召会走样的例证。当初只有“聚会的地方”(徒四31,二十8),并没有礼拜堂。我们聚会的地方,不应该是一般人所想的“圣所”。如果我们聚会的地方是圣所、礼拜堂,那么凡是圣徒所在的地方,没有一处不是圣所或礼拜堂。在任何地方我们都能敬拜。敬拜不在乎地方,乃在乎灵。在约翰四章,主说,“时候将到,那时你们敬拜父,不在这山上〔撒玛利亚〕,也不在耶路撒冷。…神是灵;敬拜祂的,必须在灵…里敬拜。”(约四21,24)我们敬拜神,乃是在灵里,所以无论在哪里我们都能敬拜,无论什么地方都能作我们敬拜的地方。所谓的礼拜堂不是当初的召会所有的,乃是堕落的基督教产生的。堕落越深,走样越远,就越变成礼拜堂的样子。今天在中外许多地方,最高、最好的建筑物就是礼拜堂。这不是召会原初的样子,乃是后来的人改变成的。
--------本段经节汇集--------
祈求完了,聚会的地方震动,他们就都被圣灵充溢,放胆讲说神的话。
我们聚集的那座楼上,有好些灯。
约翰福音四章(略,若需要被汇集,请勾选“不忽略整章”)
耶稣说,妇人,你当信我,时候将到,那时你们敬拜父,不在这山上,也不在耶路撒冷。
神是灵;敬拜祂的,必须在灵和真实里敬拜。
------------------------
  关于基督教里的施浸或施洗,大多也是走样的。圣经明明给我们看见,召会当初给人施浸,乃是把人浸到水里(太三16,可一5,8,徒八38)。但是今天的基督教,大多是用水在人头上洒一洒。浸信会虽然在施浸的事上是把人浸在水里,但他们只有牧师能给人施浸。这也是走样的情形。新约圣经给我们看见,当初乃是什么人传福音带人得救,就由什么人给人施浸(徒八26~38,九10~18)。当然,这样作乃是郑重地按正规而作,不是轻易为之,随便作的。但绝不是信徒传福音,由牧师施浸;平信徒传福音,由圣品人施浸。今日牧师给人施浸或施洗的制度并不是召会原有的,乃是经过人意而走样的作法。
--------本段经节汇集--------
耶稣受了浸,随即从水里上来,看哪,诸天向祂开了,祂就看见神的灵,仿佛鸽子降下,落在祂身上。
可1:5  
犹太全地和全耶路撒冷的人,都络绎地出去到约翰那里,承认着他们的罪,在约但河里受他的浸。
可1:8  
我是将你们浸在水里,祂却要将你们浸在圣灵里。
于是吩咐车停住,腓利和太监二人同下水里去,腓利就给他施浸。
有主的一位使者对腓利说,起来,向南走,往那从耶路撒冷下迦萨的路上去,那路是旷野。
腓利就起身去了。看哪,有一个埃提阿伯人,是个有大权的太监,在埃提阿伯女王干大基手下总管银库,他上耶路撒冷去敬拜,
现在回来,在车上坐着,念申言者以赛亚的书。
那灵对腓利说,你上前去,贴近那车走。
腓利就跑上前去,听见他念申言者以赛亚的书,便说,你所念的,你明白么?
他说,没有人指引我,怎能明白?于是恳求腓利上车,与他同坐。
他所念的那段经乃是:“祂像羊被牵去宰杀,又像羊羔在剪毛的人面前无声,祂也是这样不开口。
祂卑微的时候,人不按公义审判祂;谁能述说祂的世代?因为祂的生命从地上被夺去。”
太监对腓利说,请问,申言者说这话是指着谁?是指着自己,还是指着别人?
腓利就开口,从这经上起,向他传耶稣为福音。
二人正沿路走的时候,到了有水的地方,太监说,看哪,这里有水,我受浸有什么妨碍?
腓利对他说,你若是全心相信就可以。他回答说,我信耶稣基督是神的儿子。
于是吩咐车停住,腓利和太监二人同下水里去,腓利就给他施浸。
当时在大马色有一个门徒,名叫亚拿尼亚,主在异象中对他说,亚拿尼亚。他说,主啊,看哪,我在这里。
主对他说,起来,往那叫直的街上去,在犹大的家里,寻找一个大数人名叫扫罗。看哪,他正在祷告,
在异象中看见一个人,名叫亚拿尼亚,进来按手在他身上,叫他能看见。
亚拿尼亚回答说,主啊,我听见许多人说到这人,他在耶路撒冷向你的圣徒行了多少恶事,
并且他在这里有从祭司长得来的权柄,要捆绑一切呼求你名的人。
主却对亚拿尼亚说,你只管去,因为这人是我所拣选的器皿,要在外邦人和君王并以色列子孙面前,宣扬我的名;
我要指示他,为我的名必须受许多的苦难。
亚拿尼亚就去了,进了那家,按手在扫罗身上,说,扫罗弟兄,在你来的路上向你显现的耶稣,就是主,差遣我来,叫你能看见,又被圣灵充溢。
扫罗的眼睛上,好像有鳞立刻掉下来,他就能看见,于是起来受了浸,
------------------------
  所谓的“圣餐”也是走样的。不仅是天主教里的弥撒,离圣经所说召会原初擘饼的情形相差甚远;就连更正教里的圣餐,也与召会原初擘饼的原样差距甚大。连“圣餐”的称呼都是走样的。圣经是说“晚餐”(林前十一20),从来没有称“圣餐”。现今有些地方吃圣餐,是用面包切成许多块,不像召会当初众圣徒只擘一个饼,只喝一个杯,见证基督的身体只有一个(十16~17)。吃圣餐的饼是切开的,杯是分开的,这些都是走样的情形。
--------本段经节汇集--------
你们聚在一处的时候,并不是吃主的晚餐,
哥林多前书一章(略,若需要被汇集,请勾选“不忽略整章”)
我们所祝福的福杯,岂不是基督之血的交通么?我们所擘开的饼,岂不是基督身体的交通么?
因着只有一个饼,我们虽多,还是一个身体,因我们都分受这一个饼。
------------------------
  不只如此,他们说,众信徒只能领圣餐,只有牧师是专门分圣餐的。这形成了两种不同的地位,一种是分给的,一种是领受的。然而圣经给我们看见,在擘饼的时候,所有圣徒来到主面前都是同等的地位,都是领受的,没有一个是分给的(太二六26~28,林前十16~17)。众人都是直接从主手中领受,没有一个人代表主来分授。若有人代表,他就是越分的,是篡越主的。今日即使保罗来到我们中间,他也不过是位弟兄,和我们站在同等地位领受主的晚餐,不能代表主来分晚餐。召会当初擘饼时,所有信徒都是领受的,没有一个人是代表主来分授的。
--------本段经节汇集--------
他们吃的时候,耶稣拿起饼来,祝福了,就擘开,递给门徒,说,你们拿着吃,这是我的身体。
又拿起杯来,祝谢了,递给他们,说,你们都喝这个,
因为这是我立约的血,为多人流出来,使罪得赦。
我们所祝福的福杯,岂不是基督之血的交通么?我们所擘开的饼,岂不是基督身体的交通么?
因着只有一个饼,我们虽多,还是一个身体,因我们都分受这一个饼。
------------------------
  今日有的基督教团体是由信徒选举长老,这也是走样的情形。圣经给我们看见,当初召会的长老不是众信徒选举的,乃是:(一)有弟兄的生命和情形在众信徒中显为长而老的,就应该作长老(徒十五2,提前五17);(二)由使徒或使徒所指派的人,随圣灵的引导指定这样显为长而老的人作长老(提多一5)。今日由众教友投票选举长老,是召会当初所没有的。
--------本段经节汇集--------
保罗、巴拿巴与他们起了不小的争执和辩论,众人就指派保罗、巴拿巴和他们其中的几个人,为所辩论的,上耶路撒冷去见使徒和长老。
那善于带领的长老,尤其是那在话语和教导上劳苦的,当被看为配受加倍的敬奉。
提摩太前书二章(略,若需要被汇集,请勾选“不忽略整章”)
多1:5  
我从前留你在革哩底,是要你将我所未办完的事办理妥当,又照我所吩咐你的,在各城设立长老。
------------------------
  今日基督教里庆祝各种节期,像耶诞节、受难节、复活节等,也都是走样的产物。召会当初除了吃主的晚餐记念主之外,没有任何记念和节期。虽然圣经记载了主的降生、受死和复活,但圣经绝没有吩咐我们要过耶诞节、受难节和复活节。召会历史告诉我们,召会起初并没有这些节期,乃是后来的人加上的,甚至还掺杂了异教的作法,所以都是走样的。  此外,还有许多走样的名目或事物,我们无法一一列举。盼望圣徒们都记住,这些乃是召会当初所没有的,都是经过后来的人更改或加添,所以都是走样的。凡圣经没有的,凡不合乎圣经的,我们都该否认并弃绝。
 
  我们注意这些事,不是刻意要与别人有不同的意见,不同的看法,乃是觉得应该强调让圣灵有主权。我们所争、所看重的,不是样式或仪文,乃是圣灵的主权。所有今日基督教里走样的情形,都抹煞了圣灵的主权。  比方,我们不赞成信徒选举长老,不仅是因为那和召会当初的原样不合,更是因为那抹煞了圣灵的主权。选举长老,乃是让人和人的意见在召会里有地位,不是让圣灵在召会里有主权。圣经给我们看见,召会中的长老就是监督,乃是“圣灵立”的(徒二十17,28)。圣灵在召会里,先将神儿女中那些长而老的弟兄显出来,再引导使徒立他们为长老。在召会里,有的弟兄让圣灵带领走在前头,他们比众圣徒更属灵、更认识主,圣灵就在众圣徒中间,显出他们是长而老的人。他们爱主最多,出代价最多,关心神的儿女最多,在召会里劳苦最多,圣灵就在他们身上有主权,显出他们是长老。然后,圣灵借着那让祂有主权的使徒,将祂所已经显出长而老的弟兄,立为长老。所以长老的显出与设立,都是圣灵的主权。
--------本段经节汇集--------
保罗从米利都打发人往以弗所去,请召会的长老来。
圣灵立你们作全群的监督,你们就当为自己谨慎,也为全群谨慎,牧养神的召会,就是祂用自己的血所买来的。
------------------------
  若是由信徒选举长老,情形就完全不同了。投票选举长老,是让人和人的意见有主权,但却抹煞了圣灵的主权。有什么团体投票选举长老是跟随圣灵的引导,根据圣灵在人身上的地位?几乎都是以人的眼光,根据人属世的地位、钱财、势力而选出来的。这种方式不让圣灵显明人,让圣灵作主掌权,反而是人意登了宝座。投票选举是一个由人意作主的办法;圣经里没有这个办法,我们也不采用这办法。  再比方,我们所以不赞成牧师分圣餐,不仅是因为与圣经不合,与召会当初的方式不合,更是因为那是人的作法,篡夺了圣灵的主权,没有让圣灵作主运行。众弟兄姊妹来到主的桌子前擘饼时都是同等的,不该有某个人作主席,乃该让圣灵来带领,让圣灵在会中作主而运行;无论蒙恩久的或蒙恩浅的,无论弟兄或姊妹,都让圣灵作主,让圣灵运行,随圣灵引导而祷告,因圣灵的感动而赞美。圣灵能运行,圣灵在聚会中有完全的自由,所以什么弟兄都可以受圣灵引导选诗,让圣灵感动他为饼杯祝谢。然而,若由牧师或某一个人作主席分圣餐,就必然会抹煞圣灵在众信徒中间的主权,销灭圣灵的运行。所以,圣经没有这种实行,我们也不要这个实行。  神甫制度、牧师制度、圣品阶级,无一不是人的作法,无一不篡夺圣灵的主权。圣灵该在所有蒙恩的人身上有主权,使他们都得以事奉神。但神甫制度、牧师制度、圣品阶级,抹煞了圣灵在众信徒身上的主权,使他们在事奉神的事上作了失职的人。  宗派的产生,公会的存在,都是人的意见胜过主的话语,人的办法胜过主的定规,人的主权胜过主的主权,胜过圣灵的主权。人如果肯让主作主,让圣灵掌权,让主的话语胜过人的意见,让主的定规胜过人的办法,宗派就绝无产生的机会,公会也难有存在的余地。所以,宗派的问题不仅要问合不合乎圣经,更要问是人的意见算数还是主的话语算数,是人作主还是主作主?  所谓耶诞节、受难节、复活节,以及今日天主教或更正教里许多作法和礼仪,无一不是人的意见胜过了主的话语,人的办法胜过了主的定规,人作主胜过了主作主。人如果肯让主作主胜过人作主,肯让主的话语抹煞人的意见,肯让主的定规吞灭人的办法,今日的基督教就要变作何等单纯而刚强,圣别而丰富。今日的基督教所以如此掺杂而软弱,妥协而贫穷,就是因为人的意见、人的办法、人的主权,在其中有了地位。所以,我们要脱去一切掺杂、妥协的事物,才能单纯、圣别的事奉主。凡是召会当初所没有的,凡是与圣经的教训、原则和榜样不合的,必是人意的掺杂,属世的调和;我们都该脱离,都该弃绝。  举这些具体的例子,圣徒们就可以知道,为什么我们在许多事上似乎和别人不同,甚至有争执。或许有的人要说,不必这样分别,不必这样争执;但我们无法不如此,因为我们看这些事非常严重。我们在神面前蒙了怜悯,知道这一个分别太大!到底是人在召会中有主权,还是主在召会中有主权?不是争外面的对错,乃是争到底是谁在召会中有主权、有地位。  所有问题都在于,是人和人的意见在召会里有地位,还是圣灵在召会里有主权。我们若只争外面对不对,只注重外表、仪式,就是何等的可怜。然而我们注重的不仅仅是外表,更是主的主权;不是仅仅争圣餐对不对,乃是争在擘饼时,主到底有没有完全的主权;不是单单争选举长老对不对,更是争在长老产生的事上,到底圣灵有没有完全的主权。所有问题都在这一点。你我若在主面前清楚这件事,关心圣灵在召会中的主权,就无法再活在基督教走样的情形里。你一遇到那种情形,里面会难过。不仅大事上,即使是小事上,你一看见人不让圣灵作主,里面就会觉得痛心。  因这缘故,我们愿意把所有今日基督教里和召会当初原样不合的情形,不管它是什么来源,是多好、多有价值,统统都摆在一边。这并不是因为别人那样作,我们偏偏要这样作。如果我们居心如此,那就完全错了。我们没有一点意思要故意和别人不同,我们不过是要让圣灵在召会中,恢复祂的主权,恢复祂的地位。我们不是要和别人闹意见,乃是要顾到圣灵的主权和主的地位。  我们把今日基督教里走样的情形摆在一边,单纯的是因为那些情形抹煞了主的地位,抹煞了圣灵的主权。我们愿意在召会中,让主恢复祂的地位,让圣灵恢复祂的主权,而回到召会当初的原样。
 
  我们清楚今日基督徒中间的情形之后,就知道在人面前该用怎样的态度,来摸召会的事,才是对的。首先,我们的事奉主要是注重积极的事,并不是注重这些消极的事。虽然我们不赞成今日基督教里走样的事,但反对这些事不是我们事奉所注重的。我们被主兴起来,不是要批评别人的错,攻击别人的错;那不是我们的职事。我们被主兴起来,目的乃是要把对的给人。我们不是受差遣作消极的工作,乃是受差遣作积极的工作。我们说到这些消极的情形,是要用来作背景,衬托出积极的情形。我们举例,并没有意思要攻击人、反对人。我们不是要和人争论,而是要坚持我们所蒙的光照。我们不愿和人起争论,因为争论是没有用处的。  我们不该在消极的事上和人争辩,乃该供应并给人看见积极的事。人看见积极方面对的光景,就会认识消极方面错的情形。这样的人如果仍执意留在错的情形里,那么他就必须向主负责。召会今天已经紊乱了,我们无法管太多的事,只能把真理陈明出来,盼望所有错乱的情形都拨乱反正,理得正确。因此,我们的职事不是要批评任何人,攻击任何人,或反对任何人。  我们的事奉该站在对的地位上,用对的态度作对的事。在一切事奉主的事上,我们一面该在外面有合乎圣经的表样,另一面更该在里面有属灵的实际。我们该照着圣经的真理,在圣灵的实际里事奉主。凡圣经所没有的,凡召会原初没有的,我们都不该要,不该作。但别人如果要那些事,作那些事,我们不批评也不反对,因为批评、反对不是我们的职事。  其次,我们也该有个态度,不怕人批评我们或反对我们,只顾到神所给我们的负担。只要我们所作的是出乎主,就不该管人怎样对待我们。人赞成,我们是这样作;人反对,我们也是这样作。我们这样作或者不这样作,不该受人的影响,只该受神的支配。我们的心只该向着神,我们的眼也只该看着神;我们只该讨神的喜悦,不该管人的好恶。  我们不该批评人,也不该怕人批评。我们只该凭着清洁的良心,照着圣经的亮光,跟随圣灵的引导,作神所要我们作的。至于别人如何作,或如何看待我们,都不是我们的事。这就是我们在人面前该有的态度。
 
  我们在人面前该有对的态度,在神面前也该有对的态度。我们清楚今日基督徒中间的情形,也清楚神将我们兴起来的目的,并且在人面前也有不偏不倚的正确态度;这时,我们就可以,也应该,向神表示我们的态度。  我们在人面前的态度要对,在神面前的态度也要对。我们看见今日基督徒中间的种种情形,不能立刻就厌恶、定罪。我们要求神扩大我们的度量,来容纳神所容纳的。我们该在神面前表示:“我们在这里事奉你,不是出于我们,乃是出于你。是你将我们兴起来,叫我们事奉你。若是我们在这里有那些事奉使你儿子的福音和见证得益处的,就求你祝福。如果有那些事奉是叫你儿子的福音受亏损,叫你儿子的见证受搅扰的,就求你伸手拦阻,并收回你的祝福。这不是为着我们,乃是为着你。”这样的表示是厉害的,不只是向神表示我们的态度,也是和神办交涉。如果我们的立场、存心以及态度是对的,我们向神的表示非常容易蒙神眷顾。  我们需要在神面前表示我们的态度,向神发出这样厉害的祷告。这样的祷告不是平常的祷告,不是苦求或哀告,乃是交涉。交涉需要正确的地位。我们的地位必须是为着神的,才能有这样与神办交涉的祷告。我们必须是神所兴起、所差遣的,不照自己的意愿作事。若非如此,我们就不能这样祷告。我们若不能这样祷告,我们的事奉就有问题。  我们必须能够说,不是我们自己要这样作,也不是我们和基督教闹意见,要自立一个团体来聚会,乃是神的灵在祂的恩典中眷顾了我们,叫我们里面有负担、有感觉,非这样起来事奉祂不可。这不是因着我们自己的爱好,为着自己的娱乐,乃是因着神的启示,为着神的托付。我们能坦然对神说,“神啊,你知道这些事不是我愿意作的,这条路也不是我要走的,这一切与我没有利益,对我也没有享受。乃是你抓住我作这些事,走这条路,并这样事奉你。所以这是你的事,不是我的事;是你负责,不是我负责。”若是这样,我们就有正确的地位和立场。  有了这样的地位,我们也该向神祷告和表示说,“你儿女所作的工作,凡是与你的召会和见证有益的,我们都赞成,都求你祝福。否则,就求你拦阻那个工作,收回你的祝福。”我们若在对的立场上这样祷告和表示,神的手定规要出来干涉,很多难处就要得着解决。辩论没有用,我们必须有对的立场,然后根据这立场向神祷告,向神表示我们的态度。神就要出来干涉,表白谁是在地上和祂表同情,作祂的出口。  我们该在神面前表示我们的态度,而不应该含糊。神喜悦在地上有人站在祂这一边,与祂表同情。我们该对祂说,我们要祂所要的,拒绝祂所不要的。我们该向祂表示我们的态度。  原刊于一九五一年八月“话语职事”第二期
 The brothers often do not know what kind of attitude we should have toward other Christian groups. This is a practical problem that all the saints have encountered; therefore, we will spend some time to consider this matter.
 
THE CONDITION OF CHRISTIANITY
 We must have a clear understanding concerning the condition of Christianity. The church has been in existence for two thousand years, and it has spread to nearly every continent and every race of people on the earth. It is difficult for anything that exists for a long period of time, covers a vast area, and reaches so many people to remain in its original form. Hence, after two thousand years the church has become deformed.
 
Deformed Christianity
 Christianity has been in existence for a long period of time, has spread across a vast area of the earth, and has reached many races. As a result of these complicating elements, it was unavoidable that Christianity would become deformed. No rational person would believe that Christianity has kept the original form of the church from the first century. People have deformed and changed the church. Therefore, we must be willing to question every aspect of what is found in the church and practiced by the church. We must ask whether the current condition of the church matches the original condition of the church. We cannot indiscriminately accept or hastily acknowledge anything. Instead, we should investigate everything. Anything that is right and according to God will not suffer from such an investigation.
 We should serve the Lord strictly in accordance with the form of the initial church. Regardless of how good or important something may be in the eyes of man, we should avoid and drop whatever does not correspond to the original form of the church. We should drop anything that has become deformed through the alteration of man. We need to come back to the original form of the church.
 There are several matters in which the church has become deformed. First, there are many different denominations in Christianity. We should ask whether the church had so many denominations in the beginning. If we look into this matter, we will realize that the initial church did not have denominations. The initial church was not divided into denominations and sects. The church first appeared on the earth in many localities, but the church in each locality was not divided into denominations or sects. There was only the church in Ephesus (Rev. 2:1); there were no denominations in Ephesus. There was only the church in Corinth (1 Cor. 1:2; 2 Cor. 1:1); there were no denominations in Corinth. However, today there are many different Christian denominations. These denominations did not exist at the time of the initial church; they were founded by people. In the beginning there were elders in the church, but there was no Presbyterian Church. In the beginning the church practiced baptism, but there was no Baptist Church. In the beginning the church taught holiness, but there was no Holiness Church. In the beginning there was justification by faith, but there was no Lutheran Church. In the beginning the church had spiritual gifts, but there was no Pentecostal Church. These and other denominations speak of the deformed situation of Christianity, which we must drop.
 Second, Protestant churches have pastors, and the Catholic Church has priests. After careful study, it is clear that there were no pastors or priests in the initial church; these positions were invented by men at a later time. There were gifts, such as shepherds and teachers, in the initial church (Eph. 4:11), but there was no pastoral system, priestly system, or clerical system. In the beginning all the believers in the church served God as priests (1 Pet. 2:5). There was not a group of people who served as intermediaries between the believers and God. There also was not a special group of clerical men who served God. The believers in the initial church did not serve God according to the present pastoral, priestly, or clerical systems. These systems came into existence through changes made by man; hence, these systems are deformed and should be denied and repudiated.
 Third, Christianity has professional preachers, who receive a salary. This is a deformity. In the beginning there were workers who were sent by the Lord but not professional preachers who were hired by man. There were believers who served the Lord and lived by faith but not believers who preached the word as a profession and means of income. Any system involving professional preaching is deformed, and it is the result of the degradation of Christianity.
 Fourth, the buildings used by the Catholic Church and by Protestant churches are also deformities. The believers in the initial church gathered together in many different places (Acts 4:31; 20:8) but not in church buildings. Our meeting places should not be so-called sanctuaries. If we regarded our meeting place as a sanctuary or a chapel, this would mean that believers should worship only in a sanctuary or in a designated place of worship. However, we can worship anywhere. Worship is not a matter of place but of being in spirit. In John 4 the Lord said, “An hour is coming when neither in this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father...God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit” (vv. 21, 24). Our spirit is the location of our worship to God; hence, we can worship Him at any time and at any place. Every place can be a place of worship. So-called church buildings did not exist in the initial church; they were produced by degraded Christianity. The finest buildings in many places in the world are church buildings. This is not according to the original appearance of the church; rather, it is the result of man-made changes.
 Fifth, in many cases the practice of baptism has become deformed. In the early church the practice of baptism involved the immersion of people into water (Matt. 3:16; Mark 1:5, 8; Acts 8:38). The present practice of baptism in Christianity mainly involves sprinkling a few drops of water on a person’s head. Although the Baptist Church practices baptism by immersion, only pastors can baptize people. This is also a deformed situation. The New Testament shows that those who preached the gospel and brought others to salvation also baptized those who received the gospel (Acts 8:26-38; 9:10-18). This was done in a serious and proper way; it was not a light or casual matter. There was no practice in the church of believers preaching the gospel and then pastors baptizing those who received the Lord. There was not the situation of gospel preaching by the laity but baptizing by the clergy. The present system of only pastors baptizing by either immersion or sprinkling did not exist in the initial church. Such a deformed practice was brought in by man.
 Sixth, the practice of the so-called holy communion is also deformed. The Catholic mass is far removed from the original condition of the breaking of bread referred to in the Bible, and holy communion practiced in Protestantism is also far removed. Even the term holy communion is a deformity. The Bible uses the term the Lord’s supper (1 Cor. 11:20) but never the term holy communion. Some denominations use small pieces of bread in their practice, but this is not like the practice in the initial church, in which all believers partook of one bread and of wine from one cup as a testimony of the one Body of Christ (10:16-17). Using many pieces of bread and separate cups is a deformed situation.
 Furthermore, it is a common thought that all believers can receive holy communion but that only pastors and priests can administer holy communion. As a result, two different positions have been formed, the administrators and the recipients. According to the Bible, however, the saints who come before the Lord to break bread all have the same position, and all are recipients. There is not a designated administrator (Matt. 26:26-28; 1 Cor. 10:16-17). Everyone receives from the Lord’s hand directly; no one represents the Lord to administer the bread to others. Any person who is a representative has stepped beyond his limit and is usurping the Lord’s authority. Even if Paul were in our midst today, he would only be a brother partaking of the Lord’s supper with us. Paul would not be able to represent the Lord in order to administer the Lord’s supper, because we all have the same position. When the initial church broke bread, all the believers were recipients; no one represented the Lord as an administrator.
 Seventh, in some Christian groups the elders are elected by the believers. This is a deformed situation. According to the Bible, the elders in the initial church were not elected by the believers. The elders were produced when certain brothers were manifested as being more mature and more experienced among the believers (Acts 15:2; 1 Tim. 5:17). When such ones were manifested, they were appointed to the eldership by apostles or someone designated by them according to the leading of the Spirit (Titus 1:5). The present practice of electing elders, that is, of believers voting for who should be an elder, was not present in the initial church.
 Eighth, the celebration of different feasts, such as Christmas, Good Friday, and Easter, is a product of deformed Christianity. Other than participating in the Lord’s supper in remembrance of the Lord, the church did not have any other memorials or feasts. The Bible records the Lord’s birth, death, and resurrection, but it does not command us to celebrate Christmas, Good Friday, or Easter. According to church history, such feasts were not in the initial church; they were brought in at a later time. Some of these feasts are even mixed with pagan practices; hence, these celebrations are deformed.
 Christianity has numerous other deformed practices, which we cannot enumerate here. These things did not exist in the initial church; they were added later by man. Hence, these practices are deformed. Whatever practice is not according to the Bible must be rejected.
 
Not Letting the Spirit Have Authority
 By paying attention to the matters that were in the original church, we are not seeking to be different from others. Rather, we want to stress the authority of the Spirit. Furthermore, we are not fighting for different forms or rituals. Rather, we are for the authority of the Spirit. Every deformed situation in Christianity has annulled the authority of the Spirit.
 Although the practice of believers electing elders does not correspond with the practice in the initial church, it is unacceptable primarily because it annuls the authority of the Spirit. The practice of electing elders only gives ground to opinions in the church; it does not allow the Spirit to have the authority in the church. The Bible says that “the Holy Spirit has placed” the elders in the church as overseers (Acts 20:17, 28). The Spirit manifests certain brothers who are more mature and experienced among God’s children in the church, and then He leads the apostles to appoint these ones as elders. Some brothers in the church allow the Spirit to lead them to grow in the divine life; hence, they are spiritual and know the Lord. The Spirit manifests brothers who love the Lord, pay the price, care for God’s children, and labor in the church as being mature and experienced. Then the Spirit exercises His authority and appoints them to the eldership through the apostles who submit to the Spirit’s authority. As a result, the manifestation and appointment of the elders are under the authority of the Spirit.
 The practice of electing elders results in a completely different situation. Voting allows people and their opinions to have the lordship, and it also annuls the authority of the Spirit. Some may say that it is possible for Christians to vote for elders by following the leading of the Spirit or by giving the Spirit the ground, but elections involve human insight and are affected by a person’s worldly position, wealth, and influence. Such a practice prevents the Spirit from manifesting those who should be elders, and it annuls the authority of the Spirit. With such a practice, only the human will is enthroned. Elections involve the human will, and they involve man’s assumption of authority. The Bible does not have such a method, and we cannot adopt it.
 Although the practice of pastors administering holy communion is inconsistent with the Scriptures, it also is unacceptable primarily because it annuls the authority of the Spirit. Such a practice does not allow the Spirit to operate as He wills. The saints who gather at the Lord’s table to break bread are on the same level. No person should act as a chairman; instead, we should allow the Spirit to take the lead and operate in the meeting. All the brothers and sisters, whether they have been saved for many years or are new believers, should allow the Spirit to operate in the meeting. Everyone should pray according to the leading of the Spirit and praise according to the inspiration of the Spirit. When the Spirit operates and has complete freedom in the meeting, any brother may be led by the Spirit to select a hymn or to bless the bread and the cup. However, a person acting as the chairman to administer the holy communion annuls the lordship of the Spirit among the believers and quenches the operation of the Spirit. Therefore, the Bible does not record such a practice, and we do not want it.
 The priestly system, the pastoral system, and the clerical system are human ways that usurp the authority of the Spirit. The Spirit should have authority over all the believers in their service to God. But the priestly system, the pastoral system, and the clerical system have annulled the authority of the Spirit over the believers, causing the believers to neglect the duties of their service to God.
 The existence of sects and denominations is the result of human opinion prevailing over the Lord’s Word, human methods prevailing over the Lord’s ordination, and human authority prevailing over the authority of the Spirit. If people would let the Lord be the Lord, let the Spirit lead, let the Lord’s Word prevail over human opinion, and let the Lord’s decision prevail over human methods, there would be no ground for sects and denominations to be established. Therefore, we should ask whether sects and denominations are scriptural, whether human opinion should take precedence over the Lord’s Word, and whether the Lord truly is the Lord.
 Without exception, Christmas, Good Friday, Easter, and numerous other practices and rituals in the Roman Catholic Church and the Protestant churches are the issue of human opinions prevailing over the Lord’s Word, human methods prevailing over the Lord’s ordination, and man prevailing over the Lord. If believers would let the Lord exercise His lordship, let His Word annul their opinions, and let His ordination swallow up their methods, Christianity would be pure, strong, holy, and rich. Christianity is mixed, weak, full of compromise, and poor because it has given room to human opinions, human methods, and human lordship. We must rid ourselves of all mixture and compromise in order to serve the Lord in purity and holiness. Whatever did not exist in the initial church and whatever is inconsistent with the teachings, principles, and examples in the Bible are a mixture of human will and the world. We must reject such things.
 I have cited these practical examples so that the saints can understand why we differ from other believers and why we disagree with many Christian practices today. Some may say that there is no need for differences or disagreements, but we have received mercy from God to realize that these differences are crucial. Does man have the lordship in the church, or does the Lord have the lordship? We are not fighting for right or wrong but for who has the lordship and the ground in the church.
 Should man and his opinions have the ground in the church, or should the Spirit have the authority in the church? This is the important question. It is pitiful if we can argue only about right and wrong and pay attention only to outward appearance and practices. Our focus is not on outward appearance but on the lordship of the Lord. We are not arguing about whether holy communion is right or wrong but whether the Lord has the lordship when we break bread. We are not arguing about whether electing elders is right or wrong but about whether the Spirit has the authority in the manifestation and appointment of elders. This is the central issue. If we are clear concerning the central issue, that is, concerning the authority of the Spirit in the church, it will not be possible to remain in deformed Christianity, and we will be grieved when we see a situation in which the Spirit does not have the authority.
 We desire to put aside every matter that is inconsistent with the condition of the initial church, regardless of its source or of how good or valuable it may seem to be. Such a desire is not the result of following others, and neither does it come out of a deliberate intention to be different from others. We desire to let the Spirit recover His authority and position in the church. We do not want to be dissenting for the sake of dissension; we want to take care of the Spirit’s authority and the Lord’s position.
 We have put aside the deformed practices of Christianity because they have annulled the authority of the Spirit. Our desire is to let the Lord recover His position and authority in the church and thus return to the original appearance of the initial church.
 
OUR ATTITUDE BEFORE MEN
 If we are clear concerning the condition of Christianity, we will know the attitude that we should have before men when we touch the matter of the church. Our service is focused on positive things, not on negative things. We disapprove of the deformed matters in Christianity, but our service is not focused on opposing these matters. Our ministry is not to criticize and attack others’ mistakes. This is not the Lord’s purpose in raising us up. We were raised up by the Lord to give people proper things. The Lord did not send us to do a negative work but to do a positive work. The negative conditions that we have mentioned serve as a background that provides a contrast for the positive things. The examples that we have given are not meant to attack or oppose others. We do not want to argue with others but to firmly hold on to the light that we have received. It is useless to argue.
 Instead of arguing with others concerning negative things, we should supply them with the positive things. When people see the proper condition, they will recognize the negative things. If such ones stubbornly remain in an erroneous condition, they will be accountable to the Lord. The condition in Christianity is one of confusion; thus, we cannot take care of too many things. We can only present the truth with the hope that all erroneous and disorderly things will be corrected and restored. Our ministry is not to criticize, attack, or oppose.
 In our service we should stand in a proper position and do things with a proper attitude. All the matters related to our service should have a scriptural expression without and a spiritual reality within. We should serve the Lord according to the truth in the Scriptures and in the reality of the Spirit. We should not have or do anything that is not according to the Scriptures or the initial church. We do not need to criticize or oppose those who want to keep other practices, because our ministry is not for criticizing and opposing others.
 Furthermore, we should have an attitude that does not fear criticism or opposition. Our attitude should be to care only for the burden that God has given us. As long as our practices are of the Lord, we should not be concerned about whether we are approved or opposed by others. Our practice should not be influenced by others; rather, it should be directed by God. Our heart must be turned only to God, and our eyes must look only at Him. We should please only God and not be concerned with whether others like us or hate us.
 We should not criticize others, and we should not fear their criticism. With a pure conscience, according to the light of the Bible and by the leading of the Spirit, we should practice what God has commissioned us to do. What others do and how they treat us are not our concern. This is the proper attitude that we should have.
 
OUR ATTITUDE BEFORE GOD
 We need to have a proper attitude before men and also before God. We should be clear concerning the condition in Christianity, and we should be clear concerning God’s purpose in raising us up. Moreover, we should have a balanced, proper attitude before men and a proper attitude toward God.
 We need to be right not only in our attitude before men but also in our attitude before God. We must not be quick to detest and condemn the various conditions in Christianity. Rather, we should ask God to enlarge our capacity so that our heart matches His heart. We should say, “Lord, we want to serve by You, not by ourselves. You raised us up to serve You. If our service is profitable for the gospel or for the testimony of Your Son, we pray that You would bless it. If our service causes the gospel to suffer loss or annuls the testimony of Your Son, stretch out Your hand to stop our service and take away Your blessing. Our service is not for our sake but for Your sake.” Such a strong declaration should not only be the basis of our attitude toward God; it should also be the basis of our negotiating with Him. If our standing, intention, and attitude are right, He will accept our declaration.
 We need to declare our attitude before God in strong and serious prayer. This is not an ordinary kind of prayer; it is a pleading, a negotiating. Negotiation requires a proper position. We must be for God before we can utter such a prayer. We must be those who are raised up and sent by God, and we must not do things according to our desire. Unless we are such ones, we cannot utter such a prayer, and if we cannot utter such a prayer, our service is questionable.
 We must be able to say that it is not our desire to do things in a particular way, to dispute with Christians, or to set up our own group. Rather, the Spirit of God in His grace has visited and burdened us; hence, we must rise up to serve Him. This is not for our own preference or pleasure; this is the issue of God’s revelation, and it is His commission. Therefore, we can boldly say, “O God, You know that doing these things, walking this way, and serving You do not come from us. This is Your business, not ours; it is Your responsibility, not ours.”
 We should also declare that we agree with any work that is profitable for the church and God’s testimony, and we should ask God to bless this work. If our declaration is on the right ground, God will stretch forth His hand, and many problems will be solved. It is useless to debate. We must stand on the right ground and declare our attitude toward God. Then God will vindicate those who are standing with Him and serving as His oracle on the earth.
 We should declare our attitude before God without any ambiguity. God delights in having people on earth who stand with Him. We should tell Him that we want what He wants and that we reject what He rejects. We should declare to Him that this is our attitude.
 
  本篇信息我们要交通到关乎召会和事奉上的难处。有些时候,弟兄们在事奉上常遇到一个问题,就是在面对其他基督徒团体时,不知该持何种态度。这是一个很现实的问题,各处圣徒们也常遇到这个问题。因此我们要在神面前花一点工夫来探究。
 
 The brothers often do not know what kind of attitude we should have toward other Christian groups. This is a practical problem that all the saints have encountered; therefore, we will spend some time to consider this matter.
  首先,我们对于今日基督徒中间的情形,应该要有清楚的认识。召会已经经过两千年,范围几乎遍布全球各大洲,历经地上各民族。一样东西或事物,经过长远的时间,广大的地面,和各种不同的民族,绝对难以保持其原貌,这是可想而知的。所以,我们在两千年后的今天所见的召会,已经是走样的召会。
 
 We must have a clear understanding concerning the condition of Christianity. The church has been in existence for two thousand years, and it has spread to nearly every continent and every race of people on the earth. It is difficult for anything that exists for a long period of time, covers a vast area, and reaches so many people to remain in its original form. Hence, after two thousand years the church has become deformed.
  召会经过广大的地面,历经各样不同的人种,而且时间跨越那样长久,牵涉的因素那样繁多、复杂,走样是难免的。凡有头脑的,都不会相信召会至今仍保持第一世纪的原样。召会已经走样,已经被人改得太多,所以我们对于今日召会的各面情形都要打问号,都要问:“这是召会当初的样子么?这是召会当初有的情形么?”我们不能一概的接受,马虎的承认,乃要认真的一一查问。若是对的,不会因为我们的查问,变作不对的;若是出于神的,不会因为我们的质疑,变作有问题的。

  我们今天事奉主,应该绝对照着召会当初的样子。凡是与召会当初的样子不合的,凡是召会当初所没有的,不管人看为多美好、多重要,我们都应该脱离,应该去掉。凡是走样、经过人改过的,我们统统都应该脱离,应该丢弃。我们要回到召会当初的样子。
 
 Christianity has been in existence for a long period of time, has spread across a vast area of the earth, and has reached many races. As a result of these complicating elements, it was unavoidable that Christianity would become deformed. No rational person would believe that Christianity has kept the original form of the church from the first century. People have deformed and changed the church. Therefore, we must be willing to question every aspect of what is found in the church and practiced by the church. We must ask whether the current condition of the church matches the original condition of the church. We cannot indiscriminately accept or hastily acknowledge anything. Instead, we should investigate everything. Anything that is right and according to God will not suffer from such an investigation.

 We should serve the Lord strictly in accordance with the form of the initial church. Regardless of how good or important something may be in the eyes of man, we should avoid and drop whatever does not correspond to the original form of the church. We should drop anything that has become deformed through the alteration of man. We need to come back to the original form of the church.

 There are several matters in which the church has become deformed. First, there are many different denominations in Christianity. We should ask whether the church had so many denominations in the beginning. If we look into this matter, we will realize that the initial church did not have denominations. The initial church was not divided into denominations and sects. The church first appeared on the earth in many localities, but the church in each locality was not divided into denominations or sects. There was only the church in Ephesus (Rev. 2:1); there were no denominations in Ephesus. There was only the church in Corinth (1 Cor. 1:2; 2 Cor. 1:1); there were no denominations in Corinth. However, today there are many different Christian denominations. These denominations did not exist at the time of the initial church; they were founded by people. In the beginning there were elders in the church, but there was no Presbyterian Church. In the beginning the church practiced baptism, but there was no Baptist Church. In the beginning the church taught holiness, but there was no Holiness Church. In the beginning there was justification by faith, but there was no Lutheran Church. In the beginning the church had spiritual gifts, but there was no Pentecostal Church. These and other denominations speak of the deformed situation of Christianity, which we must drop.

 Second, Protestant churches have pastors, and the Catholic Church has priests. After careful study, it is clear that there were no pastors or priests in the initial church; these positions were invented by men at a later time. There were gifts, such as shepherds and teachers, in the initial church (Eph. 4:11), but there was no pastoral system, priestly system, or clerical system. In the beginning all the believers in the church served God as priests (1 Pet. 2:5). There was not a group of people who served as intermediaries between the believers and God. There also was not a special group of clerical men who served God. The believers in the initial church did not serve God according to the present pastoral, priestly, or clerical systems. These systems came into existence through changes made by man; hence, these systems are deformed and should be denied and repudiated.

 Third, Christianity has professional preachers, who receive a salary. This is a deformity. In the beginning there were workers who were sent by the Lord but not professional preachers who were hired by man. There were believers who served the Lord and lived by faith but not believers who preached the word as a profession and means of income. Any system involving professional preaching is deformed, and it is the result of the degradation of Christianity.

 Fourth, the buildings used by the Catholic Church and by Protestant churches are also deformities. The believers in the initial church gathered together in many different places (Acts 4:31; 20:8) but not in church buildings. Our meeting places should not be so-called sanctuaries. If we regarded our meeting place as a sanctuary or a chapel, this would mean that believers should worship only in a sanctuary or in a designated place of worship. However, we can worship anywhere. Worship is not a matter of place but of being in spirit. In John 4 the Lord said, “An hour is coming when neither in this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father...God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit” (vv. 21, 24). Our spirit is the location of our worship to God; hence, we can worship Him at any time and at any place. Every place can be a place of worship. So-called church buildings did not exist in the initial church; they were produced by degraded Christianity. The finest buildings in many places in the world are church buildings. This is not according to the original appearance of the church; rather, it is the result of man-made changes.

 Fifth, in many cases the practice of baptism has become deformed. In the early church the practice of baptism involved the immersion of people into water (Matt. 3:16; Mark 1:5, 8; Acts 8:38). The present practice of baptism in Christianity mainly involves sprinkling a few drops of water on a person’s head. Although the Baptist Church practices baptism by immersion, only pastors can baptize people. This is also a deformed situation. The New Testament shows that those who preached the gospel and brought others to salvation also baptized those who received the gospel (Acts 8:26-38; 9:10-18). This was done in a serious and proper way; it was not a light or casual matter. There was no practice in the church of believers preaching the gospel and then pastors baptizing those who received the Lord. There was not the situation of gospel preaching by the laity but baptizing by the clergy. The present system of only pastors baptizing by either immersion or sprinkling did not exist in the initial church. Such a deformed practice was brought in by man.

 Sixth, the practice of the so-called holy communion is also deformed. The Catholic mass is far removed from the original condition of the breaking of bread referred to in the Bible, and holy communion practiced in Protestantism is also far removed. Even the term holy communion is a deformity. The Bible uses the term the Lord’s supper (1 Cor. 11:20) but never the term holy communion. Some denominations use small pieces of bread in their practice, but this is not like the practice in the initial church, in which all believers partook of one bread and of wine from one cup as a testimony of the one Body of Christ (10:16-17). Using many pieces of bread and separate cups is a deformed situation.

 Furthermore, it is a common thought that all believers can receive holy communion but that only pastors and priests can administer holy communion. As a result, two different positions have been formed, the administrators and the recipients. According to the Bible, however, the saints who come before the Lord to break bread all have the same position, and all are recipients. There is not a designated administrator (Matt. 26:26-28; 1 Cor. 10:16-17). Everyone receives from the Lord’s hand directly; no one represents the Lord to administer the bread to others. Any person who is a representative has stepped beyond his limit and is usurping the Lord’s authority. Even if Paul were in our midst today, he would only be a brother partaking of the Lord’s supper with us. Paul would not be able to represent the Lord in order to administer the Lord’s supper, because we all have the same position. When the initial church broke bread, all the believers were recipients; no one represented the Lord as an administrator.

 Seventh, in some Christian groups the elders are elected by the believers. This is a deformed situation. According to the Bible, the elders in the initial church were not elected by the believers. The elders were produced when certain brothers were manifested as being more mature and more experienced among the believers (Acts 15:2; 1 Tim. 5:17). When such ones were manifested, they were appointed to the eldership by apostles or someone designated by them according to the leading of the Spirit (Titus 1:5). The present practice of electing elders, that is, of believers voting for who should be an elder, was not present in the initial church.

 Eighth, the celebration of different feasts, such as Christmas, Good Friday, and Easter, is a product of deformed Christianity. Other than participating in the Lord’s supper in remembrance of the Lord, the church did not have any other memorials or feasts. The Bible records the Lord’s birth, death, and resurrection, but it does not command us to celebrate Christmas, Good Friday, or Easter. According to church history, such feasts were not in the initial church; they were brought in at a later time. Some of these feasts are even mixed with pagan practices; hence, these celebrations are deformed.

 Christianity has numerous other deformed practices, which we cannot enumerate here. These things did not exist in the initial church; they were added later by man. Hence, these practices are deformed. Whatever practice is not according to the Bible must be rejected.
  那么,召会在那些事上走样了呢?举例而言,在今天的基督教里有许多不同的会;无论在哪里有基督教,那里就有这个会、那个会。看见这么多不同的会,我们该问:“这是召会当初的原样么?”我们若认真查问,就会晓得这些都不是召会当初原有的。召会在当初是不分会、不分派的。虽然召会刚在地上出现时,是分在各地方,但在每一个地方的召会都是不分会、不分派的。在以弗所,只有在以弗所的召会,并没有在以弗所的这个会、那个会。在哥林多,只有在哥林多的召会,并没有在哥林多的这个会、那个会。今天各地有许多不同的基督教堂会,都是后来的人创出来的,并不是召会原有的。召会当初虽然有长老,却没有长老会;虽然实行受浸,却没有浸信会;虽然讲圣洁,却没有圣洁会;虽然有因信称义,却没有信义会;虽然有灵恩,却没有灵恩会。这些会和其他的许多会,都是今天基督教走样的情形,是我们应该脱离的。

  今天在基督教里有牧师,在天主教里有神甫。对于这些,我们也该问:“这是召会当初所有的么?”我们若仔细查问,就知道这是召会当初所没有的,乃是后来的人发明的。当初召会虽然有牧人和教师等有恩赐的人(弗四11),却没有坐堂牧师,没有牧师制度,没有神甫制度,没有圣品阶级。召会当初是所有的信徒都作祭司(彼前二5),都事奉神,在信徒与神之间并没有一班居间的人,没有一班圣品的人专司事奉神的事。今天的牧师制度、神甫制度、圣品阶级,都不是召会当初事奉神的原样,乃是经过人手改动而有的,所以是走样的,也是我们应该否认、拒绝的。

  今天基督教里有领薪水的职业传道,这也是走样的情形。召会当初有主所差遣的工人,却没有人所聘雇的职业传道;有凭信心事奉主而生活的,却没有靠薪水作传道当职业的。这种职业传道及薪水制度,乃是召会走样的情形,是基督教堕落所产生的结果。

  今日不论是天主教、或更正教的礼拜堂,也是召会走样的例证。当初只有“聚会的地方”(徒四31,二十8),并没有礼拜堂。我们聚会的地方,不应该是一般人所想的“圣所”。如果我们聚会的地方是圣所、礼拜堂,那么凡是圣徒所在的地方,没有一处不是圣所或礼拜堂。在任何地方我们都能敬拜。敬拜不在乎地方,乃在乎灵。在约翰四章,主说,“时候将到,那时你们敬拜父,不在这山上〔撒玛利亚〕,也不在耶路撒冷。…神是灵;敬拜祂的,必须在灵…里敬拜。”(约四21,24)我们敬拜神,乃是在灵里,所以无论在哪里我们都能敬拜,无论什么地方都能作我们敬拜的地方。所谓的礼拜堂不是当初的召会所有的,乃是堕落的基督教产生的。堕落越深,走样越远,就越变成礼拜堂的样子。今天在中外许多地方,最高、最好的建筑物就是礼拜堂。这不是召会原初的样子,乃是后来的人改变成的。

  关于基督教里的施浸或施洗,大多也是走样的。圣经明明给我们看见,召会当初给人施浸,乃是把人浸到水里(太三16,可一5,8,徒八38)。但是今天的基督教,大多是用水在人头上洒一洒。浸信会虽然在施浸的事上是把人浸在水里,但他们只有牧师能给人施浸。这也是走样的情形。新约圣经给我们看见,当初乃是什么人传福音带人得救,就由什么人给人施浸(徒八26~38,九10~18)。当然,这样作乃是郑重地按正规而作,不是轻易为之,随便作的。但绝不是信徒传福音,由牧师施浸;平信徒传福音,由圣品人施浸。今日牧师给人施浸或施洗的制度并不是召会原有的,乃是经过人意而走样的作法。

  所谓的“圣餐”也是走样的。不仅是天主教里的弥撒,离圣经所说召会原初擘饼的情形相差甚远;就连更正教里的圣餐,也与召会原初擘饼的原样差距甚大。连“圣餐”的称呼都是走样的。圣经是说“晚餐”(林前十一20),从来没有称“圣餐”。现今有些地方吃圣餐,是用面包切成许多块,不像召会当初众圣徒只擘一个饼,只喝一个杯,见证基督的身体只有一个(十16~17)。吃圣餐的饼是切开的,杯是分开的,这些都是走样的情形。

  不只如此,他们说,众信徒只能领圣餐,只有牧师是专门分圣餐的。这形成了两种不同的地位,一种是分给的,一种是领受的。然而圣经给我们看见,在擘饼的时候,所有圣徒来到主面前都是同等的地位,都是领受的,没有一个是分给的(太二六26~28,林前十16~17)。众人都是直接从主手中领受,没有一个人代表主来分授。若有人代表,他就是越分的,是篡越主的。今日即使保罗来到我们中间,他也不过是位弟兄,和我们站在同等地位领受主的晚餐,不能代表主来分晚餐。召会当初擘饼时,所有信徒都是领受的,没有一个人是代表主来分授的。

  今日有的基督教团体是由信徒选举长老,这也是走样的情形。圣经给我们看见,当初召会的长老不是众信徒选举的,乃是:(一)有弟兄的生命和情形在众信徒中显为长而老的,就应该作长老(徒十五2,提前五17);(二)由使徒或使徒所指派的人,随圣灵的引导指定这样显为长而老的人作长老(提多一5)。今日由众教友投票选举长老,是召会当初所没有的。

  今日基督教里庆祝各种节期,像耶诞节、受难节、复活节等,也都是走样的产物。召会当初除了吃主的晚餐记念主之外,没有任何记念和节期。虽然圣经记载了主的降生、受死和复活,但圣经绝没有吩咐我们要过耶诞节、受难节和复活节。召会历史告诉我们,召会起初并没有这些节期,乃是后来的人加上的,甚至还掺杂了异教的作法,所以都是走样的。

  此外,还有许多走样的名目或事物,我们无法一一列举。盼望圣徒们都记住,这些乃是召会当初所没有的,都是经过后来的人更改或加添,所以都是走样的。凡圣经没有的,凡不合乎圣经的,我们都该否认并弃绝。
 
 By paying attention to the matters that were in the original church, we are not seeking to be different from others. Rather, we want to stress the authority of the Spirit. Furthermore, we are not fighting for different forms or rituals. Rather, we are for the authority of the Spirit. Every deformed situation in Christianity has annulled the authority of the Spirit.

 Although the practice of believers electing elders does not correspond with the practice in the initial church, it is unacceptable primarily because it annuls the authority of the Spirit. The practice of electing elders only gives ground to opinions in the church; it does not allow the Spirit to have the authority in the church. The Bible says that “the Holy Spirit has placed” the elders in the church as overseers (Acts 20:17, 28). The Spirit manifests certain brothers who are more mature and experienced among God’s children in the church, and then He leads the apostles to appoint these ones as elders. Some brothers in the church allow the Spirit to lead them to grow in the divine life; hence, they are spiritual and know the Lord. The Spirit manifests brothers who love the Lord, pay the price, care for God’s children, and labor in the church as being mature and experienced. Then the Spirit exercises His authority and appoints them to the eldership through the apostles who submit to the Spirit’s authority. As a result, the manifestation and appointment of the elders are under the authority of the Spirit.

 The practice of electing elders results in a completely different situation. Voting allows people and their opinions to have the lordship, and it also annuls the authority of the Spirit. Some may say that it is possible for Christians to vote for elders by following the leading of the Spirit or by giving the Spirit the ground, but elections involve human insight and are affected by a person’s worldly position, wealth, and influence. Such a practice prevents the Spirit from manifesting those who should be elders, and it annuls the authority of the Spirit. With such a practice, only the human will is enthroned. Elections involve the human will, and they involve man’s assumption of authority. The Bible does not have such a method, and we cannot adopt it.

 Although the practice of pastors administering holy communion is inconsistent with the Scriptures, it also is unacceptable primarily because it annuls the authority of the Spirit. Such a practice does not allow the Spirit to operate as He wills. The saints who gather at the Lord’s table to break bread are on the same level. No person should act as a chairman; instead, we should allow the Spirit to take the lead and operate in the meeting. All the brothers and sisters, whether they have been saved for many years or are new believers, should allow the Spirit to operate in the meeting. Everyone should pray according to the leading of the Spirit and praise according to the inspiration of the Spirit. When the Spirit operates and has complete freedom in the meeting, any brother may be led by the Spirit to select a hymn or to bless the bread and the cup. However, a person acting as the chairman to administer the holy communion annuls the lordship of the Spirit among the believers and quenches the operation of the Spirit. Therefore, the Bible does not record such a practice, and we do not want it.

 The priestly system, the pastoral system, and the clerical system are human ways that usurp the authority of the Spirit. The Spirit should have authority over all the believers in their service to God. But the priestly system, the pastoral system, and the clerical system have annulled the authority of the Spirit over the believers, causing the believers to neglect the duties of their service to God.

 The existence of sects and denominations is the result of human opinion prevailing over the Lord’s Word, human methods prevailing over the Lord’s ordination, and human authority prevailing over the authority of the Spirit. If people would let the Lord be the Lord, let the Spirit lead, let the Lord’s Word prevail over human opinion, and let the Lord’s decision prevail over human methods, there would be no ground for sects and denominations to be established. Therefore, we should ask whether sects and denominations are scriptural, whether human opinion should take precedence over the Lord’s Word, and whether the Lord truly is the Lord.

 Without exception, Christmas, Good Friday, Easter, and numerous other practices and rituals in the Roman Catholic Church and the Protestant churches are the issue of human opinions prevailing over the Lord’s Word, human methods prevailing over the Lord’s ordination, and man prevailing over the Lord. If believers would let the Lord exercise His lordship, let His Word annul their opinions, and let His ordination swallow up their methods, Christianity would be pure, strong, holy, and rich. Christianity is mixed, weak, full of compromise, and poor because it has given room to human opinions, human methods, and human lordship. We must rid ourselves of all mixture and compromise in order to serve the Lord in purity and holiness. Whatever did not exist in the initial church and whatever is inconsistent with the teachings, principles, and examples in the Bible are a mixture of human will and the world. We must reject such things.

 I have cited these practical examples so that the saints can understand why we differ from other believers and why we disagree with many Christian practices today. Some may say that there is no need for differences or disagreements, but we have received mercy from God to realize that these differences are crucial. Does man have the lordship in the church, or does the Lord have the lordship? We are not fighting for right or wrong but for who has the lordship and the ground in the church.

 Should man and his opinions have the ground in the church, or should the Spirit have the authority in the church? This is the important question. It is pitiful if we can argue only about right and wrong and pay attention only to outward appearance and practices. Our focus is not on outward appearance but on the lordship of the Lord. We are not arguing about whether holy communion is right or wrong but whether the Lord has the lordship when we break bread. We are not arguing about whether electing elders is right or wrong but about whether the Spirit has the authority in the manifestation and appointment of elders. This is the central issue. If we are clear concerning the central issue, that is, concerning the authority of the Spirit in the church, it will not be possible to remain in deformed Christianity, and we will be grieved when we see a situation in which the Spirit does not have the authority.

 We desire to put aside every matter that is inconsistent with the condition of the initial church, regardless of its source or of how good or valuable it may seem to be. Such a desire is not the result of following others, and neither does it come out of a deliberate intention to be different from others. We desire to let the Spirit recover His authority and position in the church. We do not want to be dissenting for the sake of dissension; we want to take care of the Spirit’s authority and the Lord’s position.

 We have put aside the deformed practices of Christianity because they have annulled the authority of the Spirit. Our desire is to let the Lord recover His position and authority in the church and thus return to the original appearance of the initial church.
  我们注意这些事,不是刻意要与别人有不同的意见,不同的看法,乃是觉得应该强调让圣灵有主权。我们所争、所看重的,不是样式或仪文,乃是圣灵的主权。所有今日基督教里走样的情形,都抹煞了圣灵的主权。

  比方,我们不赞成信徒选举长老,不仅是因为那和召会当初的原样不合,更是因为那抹煞了圣灵的主权。选举长老,乃是让人和人的意见在召会里有地位,不是让圣灵在召会里有主权。圣经给我们看见,召会中的长老就是监督,乃是“圣灵立”的(徒二十17,28)。圣灵在召会里,先将神儿女中那些长而老的弟兄显出来,再引导使徒立他们为长老。在召会里,有的弟兄让圣灵带领走在前头,他们比众圣徒更属灵、更认识主,圣灵就在众圣徒中间,显出他们是长而老的人。他们爱主最多,出代价最多,关心神的儿女最多,在召会里劳苦最多,圣灵就在他们身上有主权,显出他们是长老。然后,圣灵借着那让祂有主权的使徒,将祂所已经显出长而老的弟兄,立为长老。所以长老的显出与设立,都是圣灵的主权。

  若是由信徒选举长老,情形就完全不同了。投票选举长老,是让人和人的意见有主权,但却抹煞了圣灵的主权。有什么团体投票选举长老是跟随圣灵的引导,根据圣灵在人身上的地位?几乎都是以人的眼光,根据人属世的地位、钱财、势力而选出来的。这种方式不让圣灵显明人,让圣灵作主掌权,反而是人意登了宝座。投票选举是一个由人意作主的办法;圣经里没有这个办法,我们也不采用这办法。

  再比方,我们所以不赞成牧师分圣餐,不仅是因为与圣经不合,与召会当初的方式不合,更是因为那是人的作法,篡夺了圣灵的主权,没有让圣灵作主运行。众弟兄姊妹来到主的桌子前擘饼时都是同等的,不该有某个人作主席,乃该让圣灵来带领,让圣灵在会中作主而运行;无论蒙恩久的或蒙恩浅的,无论弟兄或姊妹,都让圣灵作主,让圣灵运行,随圣灵引导而祷告,因圣灵的感动而赞美。圣灵能运行,圣灵在聚会中有完全的自由,所以什么弟兄都可以受圣灵引导选诗,让圣灵感动他为饼杯祝谢。然而,若由牧师或某一个人作主席分圣餐,就必然会抹煞圣灵在众信徒中间的主权,销灭圣灵的运行。所以,圣经没有这种实行,我们也不要这个实行。

  神甫制度、牧师制度、圣品阶级,无一不是人的作法,无一不篡夺圣灵的主权。圣灵该在所有蒙恩的人身上有主权,使他们都得以事奉神。但神甫制度、牧师制度、圣品阶级,抹煞了圣灵在众信徒身上的主权,使他们在事奉神的事上作了失职的人。

  宗派的产生,公会的存在,都是人的意见胜过主的话语,人的办法胜过主的定规,人的主权胜过主的主权,胜过圣灵的主权。人如果肯让主作主,让圣灵掌权,让主的话语胜过人的意见,让主的定规胜过人的办法,宗派就绝无产生的机会,公会也难有存在的余地。所以,宗派的问题不仅要问合不合乎圣经,更要问是人的意见算数还是主的话语算数,是人作主还是主作主?

  所谓耶诞节、受难节、复活节,以及今日天主教或更正教里许多作法和礼仪,无一不是人的意见胜过了主的话语,人的办法胜过了主的定规,人作主胜过了主作主。人如果肯让主作主胜过人作主,肯让主的话语抹煞人的意见,肯让主的定规吞灭人的办法,今日的基督教就要变作何等单纯而刚强,圣别而丰富。今日的基督教所以如此掺杂而软弱,妥协而贫穷,就是因为人的意见、人的办法、人的主权,在其中有了地位。所以,我们要脱去一切掺杂、妥协的事物,才能单纯、圣别的事奉主。凡是召会当初所没有的,凡是与圣经的教训、原则和榜样不合的,必是人意的掺杂,属世的调和;我们都该脱离,都该弃绝。

  举这些具体的例子,圣徒们就可以知道,为什么我们在许多事上似乎和别人不同,甚至有争执。或许有的人要说,不必这样分别,不必这样争执;但我们无法不如此,因为我们看这些事非常严重。我们在神面前蒙了怜悯,知道这一个分别太大!到底是人在召会中有主权,还是主在召会中有主权?不是争外面的对错,乃是争到底是谁在召会中有主权、有地位。

  所有问题都在于,是人和人的意见在召会里有地位,还是圣灵在召会里有主权。我们若只争外面对不对,只注重外表、仪式,就是何等的可怜。然而我们注重的不仅仅是外表,更是主的主权;不是仅仅争圣餐对不对,乃是争在擘饼时,主到底有没有完全的主权;不是单单争选举长老对不对,更是争在长老产生的事上,到底圣灵有没有完全的主权。所有问题都在这一点。你我若在主面前清楚这件事,关心圣灵在召会中的主权,就无法再活在基督教走样的情形里。你一遇到那种情形,里面会难过。不仅大事上,即使是小事上,你一看见人不让圣灵作主,里面就会觉得痛心。

  因这缘故,我们愿意把所有今日基督教里和召会当初原样不合的情形,不管它是什么来源,是多好、多有价值,统统都摆在一边。这并不是因为别人那样作,我们偏偏要这样作。如果我们居心如此,那就完全错了。我们没有一点意思要故意和别人不同,我们不过是要让圣灵在召会中,恢复祂的主权,恢复祂的地位。我们不是要和别人闹意见,乃是要顾到圣灵的主权和主的地位。

  我们把今日基督教里走样的情形摆在一边,单纯的是因为那些情形抹煞了主的地位,抹煞了圣灵的主权。我们愿意在召会中,让主恢复祂的地位,让圣灵恢复祂的主权,而回到召会当初的原样。
 
 If we are clear concerning the condition of Christianity, we will know the attitude that we should have before men when we touch the matter of the church. Our service is focused on positive things, not on negative things. We disapprove of the deformed matters in Christianity, but our service is not focused on opposing these matters. Our ministry is not to criticize and attack others’ mistakes. This is not the Lord’s purpose in raising us up. We were raised up by the Lord to give people proper things. The Lord did not send us to do a negative work but to do a positive work. The negative conditions that we have mentioned serve as a background that provides a contrast for the positive things. The examples that we have given are not meant to attack or oppose others. We do not want to argue with others but to firmly hold on to the light that we have received. It is useless to argue.

 Instead of arguing with others concerning negative things, we should supply them with the positive things. When people see the proper condition, they will recognize the negative things. If such ones stubbornly remain in an erroneous condition, they will be accountable to the Lord. The condition in Christianity is one of confusion; thus, we cannot take care of too many things. We can only present the truth with the hope that all erroneous and disorderly things will be corrected and restored. Our ministry is not to criticize, attack, or oppose.

 In our service we should stand in a proper position and do things with a proper attitude. All the matters related to our service should have a scriptural expression without and a spiritual reality within. We should serve the Lord according to the truth in the Scriptures and in the reality of the Spirit. We should not have or do anything that is not according to the Scriptures or the initial church. We do not need to criticize or oppose those who want to keep other practices, because our ministry is not for criticizing and opposing others.

 Furthermore, we should have an attitude that does not fear criticism or opposition. Our attitude should be to care only for the burden that God has given us. As long as our practices are of the Lord, we should not be concerned about whether we are approved or opposed by others. Our practice should not be influenced by others; rather, it should be directed by God. Our heart must be turned only to God, and our eyes must look only at Him. We should please only God and not be concerned with whether others like us or hate us.

 We should not criticize others, and we should not fear their criticism. With a pure conscience, according to the light of the Bible and by the leading of the Spirit, we should practice what God has commissioned us to do. What others do and how they treat us are not our concern. This is the proper attitude that we should have.
  我们清楚今日基督徒中间的情形之后,就知道在人面前该用怎样的态度,来摸召会的事,才是对的。首先,我们的事奉主要是注重积极的事,并不是注重这些消极的事。虽然我们不赞成今日基督教里走样的事,但反对这些事不是我们事奉所注重的。我们被主兴起来,不是要批评别人的错,攻击别人的错;那不是我们的职事。我们被主兴起来,目的乃是要把对的给人。我们不是受差遣作消极的工作,乃是受差遣作积极的工作。我们说到这些消极的情形,是要用来作背景,衬托出积极的情形。我们举例,并没有意思要攻击人、反对人。我们不是要和人争论,而是要坚持我们所蒙的光照。我们不愿和人起争论,因为争论是没有用处的。

  我们不该在消极的事上和人争辩,乃该供应并给人看见积极的事。人看见积极方面对的光景,就会认识消极方面错的情形。这样的人如果仍执意留在错的情形里,那么他就必须向主负责。召会今天已经紊乱了,我们无法管太多的事,只能把真理陈明出来,盼望所有错乱的情形都拨乱反正,理得正确。因此,我们的职事不是要批评任何人,攻击任何人,或反对任何人。

  我们的事奉该站在对的地位上,用对的态度作对的事。在一切事奉主的事上,我们一面该在外面有合乎圣经的表样,另一面更该在里面有属灵的实际。我们该照着圣经的真理,在圣灵的实际里事奉主。凡圣经所没有的,凡召会原初没有的,我们都不该要,不该作。但别人如果要那些事,作那些事,我们不批评也不反对,因为批评、反对不是我们的职事。

  其次,我们也该有个态度,不怕人批评我们或反对我们,只顾到神所给我们的负担。只要我们所作的是出乎主,就不该管人怎样对待我们。人赞成,我们是这样作;人反对,我们也是这样作。我们这样作或者不这样作,不该受人的影响,只该受神的支配。我们的心只该向着神,我们的眼也只该看着神;我们只该讨神的喜悦,不该管人的好恶。

  我们不该批评人,也不该怕人批评。我们只该凭着清洁的良心,照着圣经的亮光,跟随圣灵的引导,作神所要我们作的。至于别人如何作,或如何看待我们,都不是我们的事。这就是我们在人面前该有的态度。
 
 We need to have a proper attitude before men and also before God. We should be clear concerning the condition in Christianity, and we should be clear concerning God’s purpose in raising us up. Moreover, we should have a balanced, proper attitude before men and a proper attitude toward God.

 We need to be right not only in our attitude before men but also in our attitude before God. We must not be quick to detest and condemn the various conditions in Christianity. Rather, we should ask God to enlarge our capacity so that our heart matches His heart. We should say, “Lord, we want to serve by You, not by ourselves. You raised us up to serve You. If our service is profitable for the gospel or for the testimony of Your Son, we pray that You would bless it. If our service causes the gospel to suffer loss or annuls the testimony of Your Son, stretch out Your hand to stop our service and take away Your blessing. Our service is not for our sake but for Your sake.” Such a strong declaration should not only be the basis of our attitude toward God; it should also be the basis of our negotiating with Him. If our standing, intention, and attitude are right, He will accept our declaration.

 We need to declare our attitude before God in strong and serious prayer. This is not an ordinary kind of prayer; it is a pleading, a negotiating. Negotiation requires a proper position. We must be for God before we can utter such a prayer. We must be those who are raised up and sent by God, and we must not do things according to our desire. Unless we are such ones, we cannot utter such a prayer, and if we cannot utter such a prayer, our service is questionable.

 We must be able to say that it is not our desire to do things in a particular way, to dispute with Christians, or to set up our own group. Rather, the Spirit of God in His grace has visited and burdened us; hence, we must rise up to serve Him. This is not for our own preference or pleasure; this is the issue of God’s revelation, and it is His commission. Therefore, we can boldly say, “O God, You know that doing these things, walking this way, and serving You do not come from us. This is Your business, not ours; it is Your responsibility, not ours.”

 We should also declare that we agree with any work that is profitable for the church and God’s testimony, and we should ask God to bless this work. If our declaration is on the right ground, God will stretch forth His hand, and many problems will be solved. It is useless to debate. We must stand on the right ground and declare our attitude toward God. Then God will vindicate those who are standing with Him and serving as His oracle on the earth.

 We should declare our attitude before God without any ambiguity. God delights in having people on earth who stand with Him. We should tell Him that we want what He wants and that we reject what He rejects. We should declare to Him that this is our attitude.